WebMar 13, 2009 · The EAT has held in Chondol v Liverpool City Council that dismissing an employee for inappropriately promoting his or her religious beliefs to clients is not the same as dismissal on the grounds ... WebJul 4, 2024 · There is existing case law confirming that disciplining employees for inappropriately promoting religion in the workplace is not discrimination including Wasteney v East London NHS Foundation and Chondol v Liverpool City Council - the latter being referred to by the employment tribunal, EAT and Court of Appeal in this case.
Occupier
WebStudy with Quizlet and memorize flashcards containing terms like White v St Albans City (1990), Platt v Liverpool City Council (1997), Ratcliffe v McConnell and Another (1998) and more. WebJan 30, 2012 · The economy has driven us back to basics! Williams v Compare Maxam (1982) reasonable guidelines not for the ET to adopt its own view Slideshow 235832 by... Browse . Recent Presentations ... • London Borough of Islington and Ladale EAT 2009 ICR 387 and McFarlane v Relate Avon Limited EAT 0106/09 and Chondol v Liverpool City … simonton 5500 series windows
PPT - CIPD EMPLOYMENT UPDATE 2010 PowerPoint Presentation, …
WebJolley v Sutton London Borough Council Facts: council failed to move an abandoned boat. Two 14 year old boys attempted to fix the boat and one got hurt. They had jacked up the boat but it fell and crushed one of them Decision: HoL reversed the decision that the boys actions were unforeseeable. WebIn Chondol v Liverpool City Council, the EAT upheld a tribunal's decision that a social worker dismissed for promoting his religious beliefs to service users was not the victim of religious discrimination, as the reason for Mr Chondol’s dismissal related to his misconduct (foisting his beliefs on others) not his own religious beliefs. WebFeb 11, 2009 · Chondol v Liverpool City Council UKEAT/0298/08 by PLC Employment http://www.employmentappeals.gov.uk/Public/Upload/08_0298rjfhJOJOJ.doc End of … simonton 6100 twin double hung